In a Journalistic World Full of Opinions on Reverse Mortgages, Where is the Truth?

One month into the year 2010, many people have heard at least something-good or bad- about reverse mortgages. This product has become extremely popular in the last couple years and its popularity continues to rise. However, with popularity also comes criticism. Every article that is published seems to be a minimal amount of information clouded by a storm of opinions.

Although this product is different from any currently on the market, reverse mortgages are a still lien on a person’s home, just like traditional mortgages. Unlike traditional mortgages, a reverse mortgage does not require a person make monthly mortgage payments for as long as they live in the home.

Reverse mortgages are used so homeowners over the age of 62 can pay off their existing mortgage and obtain access to additional funds. Once a homeowner has taken out a reverse mortgage, they will never have to make a monthly mortgage payment again. This federally insured product does require that the homeowner remain current on real estate taxes, homeowner’s insurance, and home repairs. Provided that the homeowner maintains his obligations, the reverse mortgage will not become due until the homeowner moves away or otherwise vacates the home. If the homeowner fails to meet these obligations, the reverse mortgage could become due and payable before the homeowner leaves the home.

The federally insured reverse mortgage does have costs associated with it, just as all financial products do. Most of the up front costs associated with the product go directly to the government so that the reverse mortgage remains a non-recourse product. It is considered non-recourse because, assuming the homeowner continues to respect his contractual obligations, he will never owe more than the fair market sale value of the home.

Reverse mortgage benefits can help people who cannot comfortably afford their mortgage payments, health care, and daily expenses. Important to note is that this product is something which should be discussed with the homeowner’s heirs. In order for the home to remain in the family after the homeowner has passed away, the estate will be responsible for paying off or refinancing the reverse mortgage. This loan should not be considered if a homeowner wishes to leave a mortgage-free home to their heirs because it is a loan and does need to be repaid.

It seems that some critics are unclear on many important facts about this loan. The fees can be a little higher than traditional mortgages, but the interest is not. Also, the largest fees go directly to the government for insuring the reverse mortgage, not to the banker to make a quick buck. For homeowners who could use this product, the benefits strongly outweigh the costs.

There is a lot of misinformation surrounding reverse mortgages. This product is not right for everyone, but also should not just be used in the case of last resort. It can greatly help senior homeowners enjoy their retirement and the protections surrounding the mortgage continue to improve. Hopefully, the product will be around for many years to help seniors without enabling anyone to take advantage of them.

As a former psychology major, finding solutions to resolve people’s problems has always been a subject of interest to me. I hope that my writing will give people the knowledge and confidence to make important decisions about reverse mortgages. In addition to writing, I love to read, knit, spend time with friends and family, and watch the Missouri Tigers and Green Bay Packers!

Tweet This Post